What then about crime fiction, so highly esteemed as literature, at least here in the Scandinavian countries? Is it at all literature? No it isn’t. The aim of this literature is not to ask into the fundamentals of existence, of life, of death, it is not to try to reach the universal through the unique, it is a try to avoid such an asking, such unique universality, by stating already given answers that are not really answers, but just something one has heard before. It therefore feels as a pleasant and safe answer, and what feels pleasant and safe one could also call entertaining.
And when you've had a chance to read Any Human Face, I'll tell you what I think...
5 comments:
This definition of the function of literature - 'to ask into the fundamentals of existence, of life, of death...to try to reach the universal through the unique' - apart from being clumsily phrased and distinctly priggish is simply inadequate.
Equally clumsy and unsatisfactory is the notion that one can lump all Scandanavian crime novels together.
You've basically pre-empted me here, Brian. Though I think the clumsy phrasing might be the result of Fosse's not being a native speaker. He's clearly got it in for Stieg Larsson though. And there is a case for saying that the classic whodunit is a consolatory genre... But I'll save the rest of my thoughts for a later post, as I promised.
There's a very interesting piece on Stieg Larsson & co here
http://www.nplusonemag.com/man-who-blew-up-welfare-state
that argues that Scandanavian crime fiction in gerneral and Larsson in particular is anything but consolatory.
or even in general
Sorry Brian, I've only just realised your last comment hadn't been ok'd!
You're quite right, but I wouldn't call Larsson a classic whodunit - I was thinking more of Midsomer Murders...
Post a Comment